The Get Current Deal

The most recent issues of Brick! Catch up on your reading and get acquainted with our latest literary offerings with Issues 103, 104, 105, and 106—all for only $25 (+shipping*). Plus, a free, limited-edition Brick tote bag!

In these issues, you’ll find Edwidge Danticat, Anne Carson, Ocean Vuong, Kevin Adonis Browne, Robert Hass, Louise Erdrich, Lina Meruane, Yoko Tawada, Michael Ondaatje, Teju Cole, and more!


Shop the Get Current Deal now.

Posted on

The Craft of Editing

Laurie D. Graham: Jan, you and I have worked together a number of times now in a few different editorial capacities, and I count myself lucky to have edited your work. I’ve learned a lot from doing so. I know you to be a very precise writer of both poetry and prose: when we’ve worked together on your pieces for Brick, you’ve had such a clear sense of what your sentences are doing, or how your stanzas move, and I’m curious to know what your own editing process looks like. Do you think of editing your own work as an aspect of writing, or is it something different? Also, how would you describe your first drafts?


Jan Zwicky: I count myself lucky to have been edited by you, Laurie! You have excellent intuitions, and a superbly liberating way of posing queries. Wonderfully non-authoritarian. You open clarifying perspectives on my work that I find extremely valuable.

My first drafts, regardless of genre, are “essays” in the strict sense: attempts to get it right. There is always something that has declared itself as wanting to be communicated, something to which I’m trying to respond. I hear people talk about writing in order to find out what they mean. That’s not the case for me; for me, writing is a struggle to use the medium of language to convey a meaning I’ve already glimpsed. Because I don’t think in words, getting a first draft is nearly always a fraught and effortful experience.


Jan Zwicky in Brick 105


Writing—all communication—has a moral dimension for me. I’ve said I’m trying to respond; that means I’m responsible for getting something right, and I’m deeply aware of the potential for failure. For this reason, I usually feel relief once there is something I can recognize as a first draft. Editing is definitely part of the writing process for me—but I feel like I’m over the summit and into a new watershed. Sometimes there are other summits to be traversed, but as long as I have that first draft, they do not seem as arduous. They are not overshadowed by the possibility of complete failure.

Can you say more about what you’ve learned from editing other people’s work? Not my work in particular, but the process in general? Or do you learn quite distinct things from different editorial projects?


Graham: Brick has a really vigorous and thorough editing process, which, as far as I’m aware, is not common in the realm of literary journals. And I haven’t had any formal editorial training: I’ve learned how to do it by doing it. Primarily, editing has made me a better reader, a more perceptive reader. The amount of substantive and line-level editing Brick does has taught me how to parse a text—a process that is different for every piece of writing—to see what it’s after, to watch all its parts moving together, and to understand how I might be helpful in terms of expressing its full intention on the page.

Editing is also diplomacy work, and it too has an intense moral dimension. A negotiation takes place between writer and editor—or actually, editors, plural: a piece will pass through many hands over the course of the editing process. And I prefer to approach this as a thinking-through-together rather than a series of demands and concessions. Writer and editor on the same side of the desk, instead of opposite from one another.

I always have multiple lines of thought in my head when I edit, trying to keep multiple intentions in mind while determining what might be best, what might be possible. It’s a positioning I find very complex. There’s for sure steam coming out of my ears while I’m doing it.

What do you appreciate most in an outside editorial eye? When is an editor most helpful to you?


Zwicky: What I want to do when I write (or converse, or play music) is to become a conduit for communication. Something in the world has been able to break through the usual round of vision-clouding preoccupation and I’ve actually seen it, or heard it, or smelt it, or thought it, or remembered it; my first response to this awareness is a kind of exhilaration, an erasing gratitude, or a grief-tinged joy; but then, often—not always, but often—I’ll feel a pressure to communicate what I’ve glimpsed. How, though? As I mentioned, I’ve always had a difficult relationship with language. I have to translate what I see and think into words. And something always gets lost in that translation. That’s where an editor can greatly assist me. By giving me a clear account of their reactions—especially places where they tripped up, did a double-take, or had to retrace their steps, and places where they felt clearly and unequivocally addressed—I’m better able to triangulate among my efforts at translation, the things or events that have spoken to me, and the humans I’m trying to communicate with. I can unclog the conduit that I wish my writing to be.

Not that I always agree with an editor’s diagnosis. There are times when I can tell it’s not possible—for me, anyway—to hew closer to the thought or experience I’m trying to get on the page. But often enough, placing that knowledge alongside a good editor’s query will tell me that something in the set-up, farther back, has to change. I’ve got the viewing blind positioned as precisely as it can be positioned, but I’ve put the path to it through a bog, and when people get there, they’re out of sorts, preoccupied with their wet, muddy feet. Better build a boardwalk!

Because I don’t think in words, linguistic rhythm and tone are especially important to me. By tone, I mean both the kind that accumulates culturally (the connotations of a phrase and the way it’s usually uttered—with an exclamation point, say, or a laugh, or a shrug) and the physical sounds of words (the pitches of vowels, the sharpness or roundedness of consonants, their music). Etymology is also part of tone: does the word come from the Anglo-Saxon roots of English or the Greco-Latin overlay? Rhythm, though it’s often treated as a distinct part of verse composition, is yet another component of tone: it affects our sense of urgency, and of pleasure. All of this applies as much to prose as it does to poetry.

The best editors—for me—are people who perceive the components of complex conceptual or emotional structures and who are also alert to the ways in which rhythm and tone inflect meaning.

Does any of this echo your own experience?


Graham: Oh yes. The music of language, its rhythm and tone, is particularly loud in my ear, always (a function of my being a poet, no doubt, and having sat at a piano for a fair portion of my life). My favourite part of editing is being able to listen closely to the intricate harmonic structures writers produce. This is maybe what I’m referring to when I say that every piece of writing needs to be parsed differently. Everyone’s expressing a different music, and it’s the editor’s task to be able to follow along with the score.

I’m the sort who can get a tune stuck in her head for weeks on end, till it feels like an illness that needs treating. Perhaps the trickiest part of editing for me is to keep other people’s music from completely pervading my whole listening. If I start thinking I know best what a piece of writing needs, wants, or intends, I know I’ve got the illness, so to speak. Editing then might also be an act of maintaining the integrity of the position outside of the piece of writing. Because, as you say, that’s what’s actually valuable to the writer, to offer that outside ear.

Do you keep getting ideas for edits to your work after it’s published? I’ve seen writers give readings from their new books with pencils in their hands, altering their text as they read. Is this the case for you, or do you more often reach the point where the editing is very clearly done?


Zwicky: I do sometimes sense at great remove from the original “finished” draft that a change is required. In the cases I can bring to mind, some ten or twenty years down the road I’ve recognized a line break was wrong, and in a couple of cases I’ve heard that phrases have been extra to my purpose. Those realizations came effortlessly; I felt puzzled I hadn’t seen what needed to be done at the time. In none of these cases was I reading aloud in public, but if I had been, then, yes, I could’ve taken out a pencil and changed the text on the fly.

Then there’s Wittgenstein Elegies. For the second edition, I rewrote the end of the third section, made other smaller changes throughout, and completely reconceived how to try to communicate the effect of multiple-voices-within-a-single-textual-throw. (Elegies is not really a play or an oratorio, nor is it monovocal. I have a powerful kinaesthetic sense of how the voice functions, but it’s been a challenge to convey it on the page.) That was a huge job. You know how they say renovations are more work than building from scratch? I can attest to that in terms of houses and writing both.


Wittgenstein Elegies


That’s because when I’m editing I have to sink back in. Except for those rare moments I mentioned, I edit from inside the text rather than outside. Wittgenstein speaks of a mistaken approach to understanding language as making us feel as though we had to mend a torn spider’s web with our fingers. Maybe he’s right that when you have that sensation doing philosophy, you know you’re on the wrong track; but it seems to me an excruciatingly accurate description of what has to happen if you’re going to change a finished piece in any significant way. For me, a finished piece is very like a spider’s web: everything is connected to everything else. A little quiver here sets up a little quiver there. If you’re going to cut a paragraph or a sentence, or add one, you’ve got to make sure that all the threads in the result are seamlessly connected up. Because—ah! this is important, this is probably what I’m struggling to say—that connectedness is usually not something of which a reader is consciously aware. From the outside—not making the text but reading it—what a reader should be aware of is what the writing is pointing to, its meaning. If they’re consciously aware of the writing as they’re reading, the writing isn’t communicating; it’s about itself. (Even this observation needs a caveat: in some great writing, there are cadential gestures whose verbal clothing is memorable. “Wow!” we say. “Listen to this!”) In the editing stage of a piece, I’m still on the inside, checking out the ropes, as it were. When I get done with that, I’m usually imaginatively tired—I let go. I stop thinking about it from the inside. Which means I continue to edit at my peril. Knowing that there are all those intricate connexions, even when I’m no longer consciously aware of their precise nature and number, stops me fussing once I’ve let go.

You describe your value as an editor resting in your ability to maintain a perspective outside the piece. I agree: the editor’s task is to inform a writer of what they’re hearing. At the same time, I value immensely the work of editors who can say to me, “If I were you, I might try this phrasing here.” Sometimes such suggestions can have the effect of someone turning on a light: right, right, I see! Other times I sense immediately that the suggestion won’t work because it’s not “connecting up” with things it has to connect up with—but that the editor could make that suggestion helps me understand what in that connected complex is not resonating strongly enough. And every now and then I’ll choose not to act on a suggestion only to wake up in the middle of the night and realize that I’m the one who’s not hearing what’s connecting up with what.

But now: for an editor to be able to make those kinds of suggestions, they have to have done some version of what you describe as absorbing the music of a piece in order to parse it, or as watching all the parts move together. Does this mean there are two kinds of “outsides”? A readerly “outside” and an editorial “outside”? Or is it that the reader is indeed outside whereas the editor is positioned on the border between the inside and the outside?


Graham: I think that’s it! And there might even be degrees of or different positions along or within that editorial border zone. I’ve always noticed a significant difference between the reading we do in order to decide what goes into an issue and the reading we do as we edit and prepare queries for a writer. The first instance has me reading as if from the perspective of a reader—that readerly outside. Though I’m not quite “the reader” as I read, I imagine myself to be: I imagine how a reader might respond to the piece, while also putting my toes on that border, looking at how the piece is saying what it’s saying, but in a broader way, from a little further back. And it’s sometimes a surprise to then dig into edits and notice things I simply didn’t see before. It can be a little startling or confounding—How did I miss all that’s happening here?—but I was reading from a different position, from further outside.

That second type of outside you describe, the editorial outside, requires a seeing in all directions from an in-between place: How will the reader understand this phrasing? What is the writer trying to say here? Will this piece of punctuation guide the reader appropriately? And perhaps most importantly, am I railroading the writer’s intentions with these suggestions? Do I need to back off and let the thing unfold?

This might relate to what I mentioned earlier about diplomacy: the editor is responsible for the path across that border, from writer to reader, inside to outside—to help present something seamless for the reader that brings out in full what the writer intends. I think too of the copy editor’s and the proofreader’s places in that border zone, as well as the difference between substantive and line edits. The challenge can be to understand and maintain the integrity of one’s particular editorial role, which is also a shifting role, or one that will have you moving outside and inside—or, rather than inside, maybe it’s a closeness, as inside as an outside eye can get.

I get the sense when I’m editing that I can see into the structure of the sentences and paragraphs, and I can watch closely the meaning and its unfolding, but I can’t truly know the writer’s perspective, can at best make guesses as to how they’d react to a query. So, just as we start the editorial cycle by reading as if we were readers, maybe key to the process of editing is reading as if from the inside, without actually being there.


For more on The Craft of Editing, check out Brick magazine’s YouTube series.

Posted on

Coming Soon: The Craft of Editing


Please join us later in March on Brick‘s YouTube channel for The Craft of Editing, a series of in-depth discussions between recent Brick contributors and the magazine’s editors. Writers of non-fiction at all stages of their careers offer perspectives on their own editorial processes and what they most want from an editor, and Brick‘s editors will discuss the ways they work with text. This video series also promises close readings of Brick pieces, from first draft to final publication, lending insight into the magazine’s comprehensive editorial process.

Starring Brick contributors Souvankham Thammavongsa, Judy Fong Bates, Myrna Kostash, Erin Wunker, Sadiqa de Meijer, and Y-Dang Troeung, together with Brick editors Laurie D. Graham, Allison LaSorda, Liz Johnston, and Madeleine Thien.

Series editor & producer: Lucia Cascioli

Posted on

Brick Podcast: Episode 8 with Sharon Olds

Episode 8 of the Brick Podcast features Brick publisher Laurie Graham speaks with poet Sharon Olds to discuss everything from Olds’ strict religious upbringing to looming environmental catastrophe. They consider how even the most difficult or seemingly private things about us have the capacity for poetry.


Posted on

Brick Podcast: Episode 7 with Souvankham Thammavongsa

Episode 7 of the Brick Podcast features a conversation with Souvankham Thammavongsa, wherein pushes back against being underestimated. She discusses her new short story collection How to Pronounce Knife, her Randy Travis fandom, and giving Little Red Riding Hood a brand new ending.

Souvankham’s essay, “My Cousin and I,” appeared in Brick 104. Order the issue here.

Posted on

Brick Podcast: Episode 6 with Amitava Kumar

Episode 6 of the Brick Podcast features Brick editor Liz Johnston in conversation with Amitava Kumar to consider the nature of memory, the interplay of fact and fiction, and the power (and limitations) of the written word. (This interview was conducted pre-pandemic, so no social distancing was compromised in the making of this episode.)

Amitava Kumar’s essay, “I’m Writing a Novel, but There Is the News,” appeared in Brick 103. Read it here, or order the issue.

Posted on

The Get Current Deal

If one of your resolutions for 2020 was to read more, we’ve got just the thing to help! Our Get Current Deal—the most recent four issues of Brick (101, 102, 103, and 104)—is only $20 (plus shipping). A fantastic way to get up to date on all of Brick‘s latest literary offerings. Plus, a limited-edition Brick tote bag!

In these issues, you’ll find Tsitsi Dangarembga, Billy-Ray Belcourt, C.D. Wright, Eden Robinson, Michael Ondaatje, Laurie Anderson, Teju Cole, and more!

Access this unmissable bundle here: Get Current Deal

Posted on

The Brick Modern Archive

Over the last few months Brick folk have been working quietly on digitizing past issues. Now, we’re so excited to share with you that Brick‘s entire Modern Archive–that’s eight years, or the last sixteen issuesis available online, thanks to the expert work of UK-based Exact Editions.

If you’re a subscriber you have FREE access to the Brick Modern Archive and will receive your access code and the login instructions in your next print issue, due out in early December.

If you have not subscribed yet but would like to read Brick on your device, you’re in luck: digital-only subscriptions start as low as $6.99 CAD.

One last thing: the entire Brick Archive will be available early in the New Year! That’s a whopping forty years of Brick, all online! Please stay tuned to and our social media channels for the announcement.

We hope you enjoy the Brick Modern Archive and its treasure-trove of great reads!

Enter the Brick Modern Archive


Posted on

Brick Winter Launch Party

Brick will celebrate the launch of the Winter issue on Monday, December 2, at 7:30 p.m. at the Gladstone Hotel’s Melody Bar, with readings by Souvankham Thammavongsa and Ken Babstock and a celebration of translation with Canisia Lubrin, Anne McLean, and others. The Gladstone Hotel is wheelchair accessible, AODA compliant, and has gender-neutral washrooms.

Buy the new issue, subscribe at a discount, get your limited-edition Brickbag, do your gift shopping, and eat/drink/be merry with us. ‘Tis the season to be Bricky!

What: Brick 104 Winter Issue Launch Party
When: Monday, December 2, 2019
Time: Doors at 7:30 p.m. Readings at 8 p.m.
Where: The Melody Bar at the Gladstone Hotel, 1214 Queen Street West, Toronto
How: Come for the readings, stay for the party


Posted on

We’re Looking for Volunteers

Brick could use a hand around the office. We’re looking for volunteers based in Toronto to help with a variety of tasks, from keeping our social media accounts active to proofreading and editorial assistance. And we’re always eager to find smart, thoughtful readers with a good understanding of the type of work that appears in Brick to help read unsolicited submissions.

If you’re interested in getting involved with “the best literary magazine in the English language” (so described by Robert Hass), please send a copy of your CV and a brief email to outlining your interest in Brick and the kind of work you’d like to do. Applications will close on October 15, 2019.

Posted on

Sadiqa de Meijer’s “Mother Tongue” on Literary Hub

Sadiqa de Meijer’s lyrical essay “Mother Tongue” from Brick 103 was recently featured on Literary Hub. The piece is an exquisite exploration on the intimacy that’s formed with one’s first language—in de Meijer’s case, Dutch. Read the full piece here.

Posted on

Brick Podcast: Episode 4 and a New Reading Up Now

Episode 4 of Brick Podcast is the highly-anticipated recording of the April 3 book launch for Saidiya Hartman’s Wayward Lives, Beautiful Experiments: Intimate Histories of Social Upheaval. Following a reading, Saidiya Hartman is joined by Christina Sharpe, Canisia Lubrin, and Brick editor Dionne Brand for a conversation.

If that’s not enough, we’re also serving up a second podcast: Ed Pavlić reads “Beyond Simplicity: The Journey Toward James Baldwin’s Letter from the Birmingham Motel, Parts 1 & 2,” which was a two-issue feature in Brick 101 and 102.

Happy listening!


Posted on

The Brick 103 Summer Launch: Save the Date

Please join us for a joyful night as we celebrate the launch of Brick 103!

Our Summer issue features new writing by Michael Ondaatje, Laurie Anderson, Sadiqa de Meijer, Amitava Kumar, Martha Baillie, Karen Solie, Hebe Uhart, Fanny Howe, Louise Bernice Halfe–Sky Dancer, and Michael Redhill.

Come get your copy of the new issue and enjoy readings by Brick contributors and friends (TBA).

What: Brick 103 Launch Party
When: Monday, June 17, 2019
Where: The Melody Bar at the Gladstone Hotel, 1214 Queen St W, Toronto
Time: Doors at 7:30 p.m. Readings to get underway at 8:00 p.m.

Accessibility information:
The launch venue is wheelchair accessible, AODA compliant, and has gender-neutral washrooms.

To RSVP, click here. 

Posted on

Brick Podcast Now Available on iTunes

We’re excited to announce a brand-new endeavour: Brick Podcast. Featuring readings and interviews with writers, poets, artists, and storytellers from the journal’s pages, Brick Podcast offers readers even more to enjoy with each issue of the magazine. Hear what moves Brick’s contributors to create, what fuels their practice, and what they can’t stop thinking about. The series is hosted and produced by Sarah Melton and is now available on iTunes and through Brick‘s website. The series kicks off with episodes featuring interviews with Billy-Ray Belcourt, Jennifer Baichwal, and Eden Robinson. And stay tuned for a reading from Ed Pavlić and a special episode with Phoebe Wang.

Posted on

A Note About Our Price Increase

It’s important to us that a subscription to Brick be something every reader can afford. It’s been years since we last increased our prices, but as production and mailing costs continue to increase and stretch our shoestring budget ever thinner, we find we must charge a little more to bring you two beautiful and marvellously rich issues of Brick a year. And we mean a little: a two-year Canadian subscription will go up by just $4. You can still enjoy a wealth of invigorating essays, riveting conversations, and sustaining art for less than you might spend to going out for dinner.


That said, we understand that even a slight rate increase might strain some readers, and we don’t want you to go without Brick. Until the end of December, we’re offering a discount so that you can renew at our old rates. Plus, if you sign up for auto-renewal, your subscription will be held at this rate for each upcoming renewal. If you can’t renew before December 31, but a discount will make the difference between whether or not you can subscribe or renew, please send us an email, and we’ll do what we can to help.

Posted on